World Happiness Report 2023 111 Figure 4.2: Relationship Between Subjective Well-being and Generosity by Country (continued) Life Satisfaction Positive Affect Negative Affect Malta Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Moldova Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Norway Pakistan Palestine Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Romania Russia Rwanda Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Somalia Somaliland South Africa South Korea Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Togo Trinidad & Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Prosociality (Composite) Charitable Donation Volunteering Everyday Helping Prosociality (Composite) Charitable Donation Volunteering Everyday Helping Prosociality (Composite) Charitable Donation Volunteering Everyday Helping Note: Heatmap indicates the strength and direction of the relationships between subjective well-being and prosociality across 161 countries.19 Each row represents a country. Colormap indicates the Pearson’s r correlation. Blue indicates stronger positive relationship. Red indicates a stronger negative relationship. Results indicate that around the world greater life satisfaction and positive affect reliably relate to increased prosocial behavior (bluer), while greater negative affect reliably relates to decreased prosocial behavior (redder).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NzQwMjQ=